|
A Comparison of White Wheat
End-use Quality Under Dryland and Irrigated Management Practices
Continued low prices and shrinking markets for spring wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) have driven an interest in hard white spring wheat
(HWSW) as an alternative to hard red spring wheat (HRSW) for the U.S.
Northern Plains. The latest U.S. Farm Bill also offers growers a monetary
incentive for producing white wheat. White spring wheat is an attractive
alternative to red in the production of breads and Asian noodles, but to
be of benefit to producers, HWSW genotypes must be competitive for grain
yield and demonstrate high end-use qualities for these markets under
different production practices. In 2001 and 2002, HWSW, soft white spring
wheat (SWSW), and HRSW genotypes were grown in replicated yield trials in
cooperation with Dr. Bill Berzonsky, Specialty Spring Wheat Breeder.
Genotypes were grown under sprinkler irrigation at a
Fort
Peck,
Montana location and under dryland and irrigated conditions at a
Sidney,
Montana location.
Objectives
1.)
To determine if irrigated
production results in a significant change in the ash content of hard
white spring wheat compared to dryland production in western
North Dakota
locations.
2.)
To determine if irrigated
production of hard white spring wheat results in a significant change in
noodle end-use quality (discoloration and texture) compared to dryland
production in western
North Dakota locations.
3.)
To compare the grain yield
performance of white spring wheat with red spring wheat at locations
across the U.S. Northern Plains under dryland and irrigated production
practices.
End-use quality analyses and tests relative to objectives 1
and 2 are ongoing for 2002 production year samples with plans to have
these analyses completed by the spring of 2003. Kernel ash results from
the 2001
Sidney samples are reported herein with additional results for the
2001 and 2002 production years forthcoming. Yield results relative to
objective 3 are reported herein with additional results for the 2002
production year forthcoming.
The following are the most significant findings of the study
to date:
§
HWSW genotype AC Vista
exhibited mean grain yields as high or higher than HRSW genotype Parshall
at all locations.
§
Among the white wheat
genotypes, only AC Vista exhibited a mean grain yield comparable to
Parshall under irrigated production practices.
§
Compared with dryland
production, under irrigation, most genotypes exhibited a significantly
higher kernel ash content, and all genotypes grown under irrigation
produced sheeted yellow alkaline noodles that were significantly darker in
color after 24 h compared with genotypes grown without irrigation.
Comparison
of mean grain yield and test weight of eight white spring with two red
spring wheats at one ND and three MT locations, 2001.
|
Table
1. Mean Grain Yield – Bushel per Acre |
|
Genotype |
Williston |
Brockton |
Sidney |
Sidney-Irr |
|
Keene (HRSW) |
47.1 |
37.3 |
34.2 |
58.0 |
|
Parshall (HRSW) |
65.8 |
57.2 |
37.6 |
69.2 |
|
AC Vista |
67.2 |
56.6 |
47.1 |
79.9 |
|
Argent |
55.7 |
39.5 |
29.4 |
59.0 |
|
ID0377S |
42.4 |
14.2 |
29.9 |
24.1 |
|
ID0488 (SWSW) |
73.7 |
50.1 |
55.6 |
50.1 |
|
Lolo |
69.7 |
43.8 |
45.4 |
58.3 |
|
MT9420 |
66.5 |
47.2 |
44.5 |
64.5 |
|
Pristine |
35.3 |
16.4 |
24.7 |
22.6 |
|
Winsome |
46.4 |
10.6 |
30.8 |
37.4 |
|
Table 2.
Mean Grain Test Weight – Bushel per Acre |
|
Genotype |
Williston |
Brockton |
Sidney |
Sidney-Irr |
|
Keene (HRSW) |
61.8 |
59.6 |
61.9 |
61.8 |
|
Parshall (HRSW) |
62.0 |
61.3 |
63.3 |
62.6 |
|
AC Vista |
59.5 |
56.4 |
59.9 |
58.5 |
|
Argent |
61.0 |
58.3 |
61.8 |
61.8 |
|
ID0377S |
60.1 |
-- |
61.4 |
59.0 |
|
ID0488 (SWSW) |
61.2 |
56.4 |
61.0 |
60.5 |
|
Lolo |
61.2 |
56.4 |
62.0 |
62.3 |
|
MT9420 |
58.8 |
56.0 |
61.3 |
59.5 |
|
Pristine |
60.8 |
-- |
61.3 |
60.0 |
|
Winsome |
58.6 |
54.8 |
59.1 |
58.6 |
|