Fine-tuning a nitrogen budget system for sugarbeets produced under sprinkler and flood irrigation
J. Eckhoff1, J. Bergman1, C. Flynn1, and K. Rasmussen2
Previous crops were malt barley in 2004, sugarbeets in 2003, and malt barley in 2002. Residual soil N to 4 feet was 73 lb/ac and residual soil P to 6 inches was 18 ppm. Five rates of liquid 28-0-0 were applied April 26, 2005. A check treatment with no applied N was included.
Plots were planted to stand with the variety AC927 on April 26 with a commercial six-row planter. Ro-Neet 6E (3.5 lb AI/ac) and Counter (1 lb AI/ac) were applied in 7” bands at planting. Severe winds damaged plots in mid May, and plots were replanted on May 24. Betamix was applied on June 3 (1.5 pt/ac) and on June 14 (2.0 pt/ac). Plots were hand-weeded on July 7 and August 5. Headline (9.0 oz/ac) was applied by ground rig on August 11.
Sprinkler plots were irrigated May 5, Jul 8, Jul 14, Jul 20, Aug 1, Aug 15, Aug 23, and Sep 6. Flood irrigated plots were irrigated on Jun 9, Jul 21, Aug 2, Aug 24, and Sep 8. Precipitation for April 1 – September 30 in 2005 was 10.16 inches. Average precipitation for April - September period (57-year average) is 10.71 inches. Plots were harvested on September 27.
Stand, yield, and quality of sugarbeets grown under flood and sprinkler irrigation with six rates of available N, 2005.
|
available N to 4 ft, lb/ac |
Irrigation |
Harvest Stand, plnts/ac |
Percent sucrose |
Root Yield T/acre |
Sucrose Yield, Lb/acre |
Na ppm |
K ppm |
Amino-N ppm |
sucrose loss to molasses |
Extract- able Sucrose lb/acre |
|
73 |
flood |
39,450 |
19.45 |
23.9 |
9290 |
242 |
1722 |
145 |
0.98 |
8821 |
|
100 |
flood |
38,480 |
19.30 |
23.4 |
9026 |
272 |
1653 |
154 |
0.98 |
8567 |
|
125 |
flood |
40,660 |
19.27 |
25.3 |
9758 |
265 |
1592 |
157 |
0.96 |
9272 |
|
150 |
flood |
38,840 |
19.09 |
26.0 |
9935 |
312 |
1763 |
163 |
1.06 |
9383 |
|
175 |
flood |
34,490 |
18.91 |
25.6 |
9692 |
291 |
1670 |
172 |
1.02 |
9168 |
|
200 |
flood |
36,910 |
18.61 |
25.4 |
9467 |
353 |
1680 |
173 |
1.06 |
8927 |
|
LSD 5% |
|
NS |
0.35 |
1.3 |
532 |
NS |
73 |
26 |
0.06 |
518 |
|
73 |
sprinkler |
46,950 |
19.59 |
23.9 |
9358 |
312 |
1643 |
174 |
1.03 |
8865 |
|
100 |
sprinkler |
44,770 |
19.23 |
23.5 |
9031 |
351 |
1770 |
225 |
1.17 |
8483 |
|
125 |
sprinkler |
45,740 |
19.24 |
25.3 |
9735 |
360 |
1730 |
227 |
1.16 |
9149 |
|
150 |
sprinkler |
45,500 |
19.15 |
25.0 |
9586 |
346 |
1608 |
230 |
1.11 |
9035 |
|
175 |
sprinkler |
45,130 |
19.08 |
24.2 |
9235 |
359 |
1654 |
228 |
1.13 |
8686 |
|
200 |
sprinkler |
41,380 |
18.83 |
24.0 |
9044 |
386 |
1791 |
242 |
1.22 |
8459 |
|
LSD 5% |
|
NS |
0.43 |
1.8 |
NS |
67 |
86 |
44 |
0.11 |
NS |
Stand, yield, and quality of sugarbeets grown under flood and sprinkler irrigation with six rates of available N, 2003-2005.
|
available N to 4 ft, lb/ac |
Irrigation |
Harvest Stand, plnts/ac |
Percent sucrose |
Root Yield T/acre |
Sucrose Yield, Lb/acre |
Na ppm |
K ppm |
Amino-N ppm |
sucrose loss to molasses |
Extract- able Sucrose lb/acre |
|
* |
flood |
32,630 |
19.26 |
26.3 |
10,100 |
259 |
1628 |
150 |
0.96 |
9,597 |
|
100 |
flood |
32,310 |
19.29 |
26.9 |
10,370 |
254 |
1628 |
165 |
0.98 |
9,846 |
|
125 |
flood |
33,800 |
19.41 |
27.8 |
10,770 |
268 |
1591 |
175 |
0.99 |
10,220 |
|
150 |
flood |
32,430 |
19.22 |
27.9 |
10,720 |
283 |
1639 |
189 |
1.03 |
10,140 |
|
175 |
flood |
32,070 |
19.14 |
28.4 |
10,860 |
261 |
1645 |
199 |
1.04 |
10,270 |
|
200 |
flood |
33,070 |
18.93 |
28.2 |
10,700 |
303 |
1682 |
198 |
1.07 |
10,100 |
|
LSD 5% |
|
NS |
0.35 |
1.3 |
532 |
NS |
73 |
26 |
0.06 |
518 |
|
* |
sprinkler |
37,430 |
19.69 |
27.6 |
10,860 |
284 |
1654 |
178 |
1.02 |
10,290 |
|
100 |
sprinkler |
37,470 |
19.19 |
28.7 |
10,980 |
317 |
1791 |
227 |
1.16 |
10,310 |
|
125 |
sprinkler |
38,880 |
19.19 |
29.7 |
11,410 |
317 |
1765 |
227 |
1.15 |
10,720 |
|
150 |
sprinkler |
37,470 |
19.10 |
29.2 |
11,160 |
327 |
1705 |
239 |