Malt Barley Following sugarbeet

 J. Eckhoff1

 

This study evaluated performance of malt barley that followed sugarbeets under sprinkler and flood irrigation. The sugarbeets had six different applied N rates. Previous crops were sugarbeet in 2004, malt barley in 2003, and potatoes in 2002. Residual soil N to 4 feet for the 2004 sugarbeet crop was 28 lb/ac.  Five rates of liquid 28-0-0 were applied on Sep 17, 2003. A check treatment with no applied N was included. Sugarbeets were planted to stand with the variety AC927 on Apr 22, 2004 and harvested Oct 1.  No fertilizer was applied following sugarbeet harvest.  Legacy barley was planted with a commercial planter on Apr 26, 2005. Barley plots in 2005 were the same as the sugarbeet plots in 2004. Sprinkle irrigated plots were irrigated on May 6 and Jun 20. Flood irrigated plots were irrigated on Jun 21. Barley was harvested on Aug 18.

 

                                       Performance of sprinkler and flood irrigated  malt barley that followed sugarbeets which had six rates of N

Sprinkler 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

N available to sugarbeet crop*

Height, cm

Test wt, lb/bu

% plump

% regular

% thin

grain protein

Yield, bu/ac

28

84.2

45.6

93.3

6.5

0.2

10.55

85.1

a

100

85.3

45.8

94.5

5.0

0.5

11.38

99.1

 b

125

84.8

46.3

93.8

5.5

0.7

11.65

103.0

 b

150

87.8

46.0

93.5

5.8

0.7

11.09

103.0

 b

175

88.0

46.2

95.0

4.7

0.3

11.41

102.7

 b

200

83.3

46.4

94.5

5.0

0.5

11.47

96.4

ab

LSD 5%

NS

0.7

NS

NS

NS

NS

14.4

flood 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N available to sugarbeet crop*

Height, cm

Test wt, lb/bu

% plump

% regular

% thin

grain protein

Yield, bu/ac

28

80.2

46.4

93.5

6.0

0.5

10.12

80.9

 

100

79.3

46.1

93.5

6.2

0.3

9.95

86.8

 

125

79.2

45.8

93.0

6.7

0.3

9.86

77.9

 

150

77.8

46.3

93.5

6.3

0.2

9.77

77.4

 

175

78.5

46.1

92.8

7.0

0.2

9.96

83.0

 

200

83.2

46.4

93.3

6.3

0.3

10.48

89.3

 

LSD 5%

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

sprinkler 2004-05

 

 

 

 

 

 

N available to sugarbeet crop*

Height, cm

Test wt, lb/bu

% plump

% regular

% thin

grain protein

Yield, bu/ac

**

93.3

46.3

95.5

4.4

0.1

10.59

82.6

a

100

91.7

46.6

95.8

3.9

0.3

11.58

86.4

a

125

92.8

46.9

95.7

4.0

0.3

11.38

90.9

ab

150

95.3

47.0

95.4

4.3

0.3

11.24

90.6

ab

175

96.1

47.0

96.2

3.7

0.2

11.36

94.0

b

200

94.8

47.1

96.0

3.7

0.3

11.40

91.8

b

LSD 5%

NS

0.5

NS

NS

NS

0.75

8.3

flood 2004-05

 

 

 

 

 

 

N available to sugarbeet crop*

Height, cm

Test wt, lb/bu

% plump

% regular

% thin

grain protein

Yield, bu/ac

**

93.8

46.8

94.8

5.0

0.3

10.58

72.3

a

100

95.7

46.7

94.6

5.2

0.3

10.07

79.8

b

125

97.2

46.7

94.2

5.6

0.3

10.42

78.7

ab

150

95.0

46.8

94.9

5.0

0.1

10.19

76.7

ab

175

96.6

46.8

94.1

5.8

0.2

10.47

80.1

b

200

97.8

46.9

94.8

5.0

0.2

10.43

82.8

b

LSD 5%

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

7.3

                                      * residual  soil N to 4 feet + applied N for sugarbeet  crop produced in year prior to malt barley

                                      **28 lb/a in 2004, 45 lb/a in 2003

                         1Montana State University Eastern Agricultural Research Center, Sidney, MT